T D P Books
  • Home
  • About
  • Bookshelf
  • Bookstore & Reading Room
    • YouTube Candidate reading
  • PHOTO GALLERY
  • Blog

May/June 2025

4/30/2025

0 Comments

 
Hi, everyone. 

Best wishes for a Merry Month of May. 

There is a bit of writing-related news.  Just when we thought the final release date for the military history book was totally nailed down, there has been another change. The marketing director for the publishing company called to say that the release date was being pushed back until September 2. The reason apparently is that added time was needed to enable them to get additional drafts to their networks of distributors, reviewers, catalog publishers, and outlets such as Publishers Weekly, etc. I hope that is good news – that they are trying to reach out in depth to prospective clientele (and perhaps they were a bit behind in the production schedule.) 

A writing colleague noted that the Amazon system still shows a release in June. I mentioned that to the marketing director who said they would try to get that corrected to reflect the later date. The September release will be a hard cover version. 

A second news item: there won’t be a June newsletter. (Please, hold the applause.) If things go as planned, we’ll be on the road and mostly off the grid from the end of May until mid-June. You may be subjected to some boring touristy Norway and Iceland stuff in the July newsletter. (I’ll keep it brief.) 

Since The YouTube Candidate was published, the subject of real life close, unusual, or disputed presidential elections in our nation’s history has come up more frequently in conversations with those who are interested in the subject. I ran across a book titled America’s Deadliest Election: A Cautionary Tale of the Most Violent Election in American History that details the 1876 election and the cycle of events leading up to it. Wow, what a mess – it may indeed have been the nastiest and most questionable of any of our elections. Samuel Tildon, the Democratic candidate, won the popular vote over Republican Rutherford B. Hayes by 250,000 votes. He received 184 electoral votes, falling short by one vote. Hayes initially received 164. At issue were 20 disputed electoral votes from Florida, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Oregon (the one disputed vote from Oregon dealt with a technical question regarding an elector’s public office). Each of the three southern states submitted two sets of electors after chaotic elections that featured rampant electoral fraud, voter intimidation by armed paramilitary groups, disenfranchisement of black voters, and more than 150 deaths attributed to election-related violence. 

The entire election process was brought to an impasse with Tildon one vote short and no resolution regarding the 20 disputed votes. Eventually, as time was running out prior to inauguration day, an Electoral Commission composed of members of Congress and judiciary was convened to decide the outcome. The commission was comprised of 15 members of whom eight were Republicans and seven were Democrats. Perhaps not surprisingly given what we are witnessing in the present day, the commission voted along strict party lines. All 20 votes were awarded to Hayes who thus won the election 185-184. 

It still was not over. A lengthy Senate filibuster prevented the results from being made official. Eventually, that was resolved when the Democrats agreed to stop the filibuster if the Republicans (and President-elect Hayes) would agree to remove Federal troops from the South, where they had been posted as peacekeepers since the end of the Civil War. That agreement was officially anointed in what was called the Compromise of 1877. What happened next may perhaps be attributed to the ‘Law of Unintended Consequences’. The withdrawal of Federal troops in effect brought an end to the Reconstruction Era and contributed to decades more of segregation, violence, and Jim Crow laws throughout the south. On a national level, the U.S. military was not desegregated until 1948. In 1954, the Supreme Court ruling in Brown v. Board of Education led to the desegregation of public schools, though President Eisenhower had to send troops to Little Rock to enforce it. Meaningful civil rights legislation in housing, voting rights, etc., did not occur until the 1960s. All of those were long, long times to wait for what should have been birthrights for all Americans. 

New subject: At the moment, I’m about half way through a book on the Crusades. I ran across something that was too good not to mention. In the First Crusade, one of the participants, the Count of Anjou, was called ‘Fulk the Repulsive.’ Isn’t that the greatest name? His looks apparently were somewhat less than George Clooney-ish and he was described as being “querulous.” Another crusader was called ‘Hugh the Berserk.’ I mean, picture yourself as a knight in the First Crusade sitting around a campfire at night trading war stories with guys named Fulk the Repulsive and Hugh the Berserk. How cool would that be? 

And now: TRULY AWFUL PUNS 

NASA launched several cows into space. It became known as the herd shot around the world.

What do you call two birds stuck together? Velcrows.
​
Best wishes until we chat again in July. Have a great summer.
Tom

0 Comments

April 2025

4/1/2025

0 Comments

 
Hi, everyone. I’m writing this on April Fool’s Day – so the joke is that you probably thought you were going to get something useful, interesting, or worthwhile. (Well, actually, we do have a pun or two at the end – hopefully that will make it all worth your time.)

There are two pieces of writing news to mention. The first is to respond to questions from readers that asked about the outcome of the session with the University of Colorado Alumni Book Club. (The club had sent word that they were going to be discussing The YouTube Candidate in their monthly meeting in March.) I didn’t know beforehand that the book was their first discussion of a work of fiction – so that made it an especially neat meeting. Up to this point, I guess, the group had always discussed academic/factual works of history, science, psychology, astronomy, current events, etc., often written by faculty members.

Anyway, the outcome was delightful. The Zoom session we had planned on didn’t work, so the moderators collected questions from the audience and sent them to me. I answered them in a single consolidated message which was then sent to all members of the club. A few days later, I did a long telephone interview with staff members who called to gather more information regarding areas of the book that piqued the most interest at the meeting and in the written responses. A very good time was had by all.  

Here is a sample of the most interesting or frequently asked questions.

Did you write this as a fairy tale or a call to arms? I’m just finishing the book and feeling the acute lack of a Matt Anderson in our country. Is he perhaps you? Dare we hope?

Answer: Re fairy tale vs call to arms. Perhaps somewhere in between. I didn’t have either of those extremes in mind when I was putting words on paper. The story is more fiction than fairy tale in that the major stepping stones it draws on along the way to inauguration are quite real and embodied in statutes or in the Constitution. Thus, they are possible in a legitimate sense although seldom called upon (only once in our history in the case of no candidate receiving an Electoral College majority). Even the strange quirks such as would allow the selection of a VP from a different party than the president are factual.

Answer: Re call to arms. What I was hoping was to write an entertaining story that would perhaps cause readers to take more interest in the real-life happenings that the story mirrors. Then, depending on the depth of the convictions that result, respond in whatever way suits them best.

Answer: Re Matt Anderson is he you? Matt Anderson is me only to the extent that with varying degrees of intensity, I agree with the policies he talks about and share his concerns with the about the divisive atmosphere in the country and what it might mean for our future. On a personal basis, I have never thought seriously of running for office. Anyway, as the Carl Haglund character in the book says, I am now “too long in the tooth” to aspire to that role. Even if I wanted the job, I would face a critical short coming … I don’t play golf. That clearly disqualifies me from major political office! 😊

Note: What I didn’t include in the answer was that after several years of being in a job that required keeping a telephone within immediate reach, there is no way I would ever again desire a position that would make me go back to that. One of the first rules of thumb that I developed as a commander was that when the phone rings at 3:30 in the morning, the voice at the other end is not calling to let you know that things are going well. Also, the notion of almost always being within range of a camera or a microphone strikes me as being a truly uncomfortable way to spend the days of your life.   

Why didn’t you write down the transcript of the Presidential speech (the YouTube speech at the kitchen table)?

Answer: the contents of the speech speak to things that in different ways inspire most Americans – our quest for individual freedom, the value we place on it, our dreams for the nation, our visions for the future, the unique way we view our country, etc. Within those broad headings, though, people view the things that shape those feelings in different ways and assign them different degrees of importance. I did not want to detail a list of specific properties within those categories that might in certain areas not conform with the beliefs held in the minds some readers. Better, I thought, to provide a clothesline that readers could hang their own images on. Also, I very much wanted to set the stage and get into the story quickly. It seemed a good way of doing that was to describe the reaction to the speech rather than go into detail on the speech itself.

Did you base Matt Anderson on someone, or is he a mix of many people?

I did not base Matt on a specific person. I did have certain personality traits in mind for him and most other characters before I started writing – although some of them ‘grew’ and changed as the story developed. I was generally tuned in more to placing Matt and other characters in situations that I thought were necessary to tell the story, and then deciding how the characters might react in those circumstances.

Why did you choose to write a fiction book? Why now?

I’ve written fiction short stories, but I have always hoped to do a work of novel length. Time is not necessarily an ally for me and as I looked in the mirror each morning and saw the wrinkles and grey hair reflected back, it seemed clear that if I was going to get that done, I needed to get on with it. As it turned out, I had an extended break between writing obligations for military history books and used that time to draft The YouTube Candidate. That period coincided with the beginning run up to the recent election. I have long had an interest in this topic, but I had not really determined the subject matter beforehand. Then, as I became increasingly concerned with the divisive climate in the country and the possible implications of that for the nation’s future, it seemed an avenue worth pursuing – and it was a subject that seemed to be of interest to others as well.

Note: There also were questions along the lines of: how long did it take you to write the book? What was the publishing process like? Are you currently working on a new writing project?  Etc.

The answer to the latter has been mentioned in previous newsletters. In fact, on March 29, with the assistance of one of my techie daughters, I sent back to the publisher what I devoutly hope will be the final editing of the manuscript page proofs for Taking Command. Fingers are crossed when I write this, but as of the moment, we are on track for the book to be released on June 17. That date has already been published on Amazon, so it appears that the publisher (Stackpole) has indeed locked in on that date.

And now, clearly the most important part of the newsletter: TRULY AWFUL PUNS.

The doctor gave the patient some anti-gloating crème. Now all he wants to do is rub it in.

Alcohol and calculus don’t mix. Don’t drink and derive.

/////

Take care, everyone – and have a great April.
​
Tom

0 Comments

    Archives

    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    April 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    September 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    June 2018

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly